|
 |
Sponsored by
Secret Garden Exotic Birds
Tickets $5.00 Seniors $4.00
Saturday June 11th 2005 @ 2:00 PM
Special Appearance and
Book Signing By
Mark Bittner
El
Campanil Theater
602 W. Second St.
Antioch, Ca.
|
A Special
Request to Reviewers and Writers:
Please do
not reveal the "surprise" ending to this film!
www.wildparrotsfilm.com
Cast
Featuring Mark
Bittner (human)
Parrot Stars Connor
(blue-crowned conure)
Olive (mitred
conure)
Mingus, Picasso & Sophie, Pushkin,
and Tupelo (cherry-headed conures)
Urban Legends by
Ivan Stormgart, Maggie McCall, Gary Thompson, Elizabeth Wright, Jamie
Yorck
Crew
Produced, Directed,
Filmed, and Edited by
Judy Irving
Original Music
Chris Michie
Additional Photography
James Attwood, Howard Munson,
Mark Bittner,
Jacquelyne Cordes
Production Sound
Jaime Kibben
Sound Editor and
Samuel Lehmer, Skywalker Sound
Re-Recording Mixer
83 minutes 35
mm This Film is Rated “G”
Synopsis
The true story
of a Bohemian St. Francis and his remarkable relationship with a flock of wild
red-and-green parrots. Mark Bittner, a dharma bum*, former street musician in
San Francisco, falls in with the flock as he searches for meaning in his life,
unaware that the wild parrots will bring him everything he needs.
*Dharma bum
(per Gary Snyder): "A homeless seeker of truth"
Bios
Filmmaker, Judy Irving
Judy Irving, producer/director
of The Wild Parrots of Telegraph Hill, is a
Sundance-and-Emmy-Award-winning filmmaker whose previous credits include Dark
Circle, a feature film about the nuclear industry, and Out of the Way
Café, an hour-long drama. Ms. Irving received a Masters in Film from
Stanford University and is a recipient of a Guggenheim Fellowship. Her recent
six-film documentary series about the San Francisco Bay Area’s wildlife and open
space led to her interest in the wild parrot flock flying the city's north
waterfront. Her films are distributed internationally to theatres, television,
and home video.
For a detailed filmography, see
www.pelicanmedia.org
Author, Mark Bittner
Mark Bittner was born and raised
in southwestern Washington State. His ambition as a teenager was to be a Great
Novelist, but Mark was alarmed by the uniformly miserable fates of all the
writers whom he loved. So he decided to pursue a career in music instead. After
hitchhiking through Europe in search of experience, he moved to San Francisco
determined to sink or swim as a poet-singer-songwriter. He sank. Completely
bereft, he turned to spiritual seeking and ended up on the street where he spent
the next 14 years. Ultimately his search led him to the wild parrot flock,
which, in turn, led him back to writing, and his first book: The Wild Parrots
of Telegraph Hill.
Excerpts from Mark Bittner's book
The Wild Parrots of Telegraph Hill:
Introduction:
"I'm standing on the front deck
of an old cottage on San Francisco's Telegraph Hill. The cottage, vine-covered
and frail, is nestled within the immense and chaotically lush gardens that
tumble down the hill's steep eastern face. Just to my right is a large cage
containing three lime-green parrots with cherry-red heads. On top of the cage,
another parrot prowls at liberty. In my left hand, I'm holding a cup filled
with sunflower seeds. Clinging to the cup's rim are two more parrots who are
making quick and expert work of the seeds. There are parrots on my right hand,
on my shoulders, and on my head.
In front of me, on the limbs of
a tall shrub, are another dozen or so. They watch me with eager eyes as I pass
around a handful of seeds. One of them, determined to get my attention, flaps
his wings furiously, causing the thin branch he's perched on to bounce up and
down. Five more parrots eat from a pile of seeds on the deck railing. To my
far right, a gang of fifteen crowds around a large, seed-filled dish that sits
on the thick growth of ivy climbing over the railing corner. Another ten sit on
the power lines above me. In all, I'm surrounded by more than fifty parrots.
The birds on the lines start up
an insistent, staccato squawking that grows louder and more anxious as those
below gradually join in. A group of tourists, their faces lit with fascination,
stop to stare. The squawking is getting so loud that one of the tourists has to
shout his question.
"Don't you ever lose any?"
"They're not mine," I shout
back, laughing. "They're wild."
Wild?...Are you serious?
Wild parrots in San Francisco?"
Before I can answer, the
screaming hits a tremendous peak, and the entire flock bolts. In the scramble
to leave, a few of the birds nearly collide with the startled, ducking
tourists. The parrots continue to scream as they fly on stiff, frantic wings
through a gap in a row of trees and disappear from view.
Yes. Wild parrots in San
Francisco."
The Wisdom of Parrots:
"In Zen Mind, Beginner's Mind, Suzuki-roshi tells a story about a trip he
took to Yosemite. While there, he stopped to watch a waterfall. It was one of
the very tall ones, and he noted that when the stream at the top of the ridge
hit the cliff, it split into many individual droplets on its way to the bottom.
There, the individual droplets came back together in one stream. I'd read that
story many times without comprehending his point. It's simple: There is one
river until it hits that cliff which is life. The one river then breaks up into
many individual living beings—humans, animals, and plants—until we hit the
bottom of the cliff and become one river again. Each droplet loses only its
identity as a single drop. But nothing is really lost. It's all still there.
I'd encountered this idea in different ways many times over the years, but I'd
never grasped it. It's an elementary idea, and not so difficult to understand.
But my problem was that I'd been thinking about consciousness solely in human
terms. It wasn't until I considered the minds of the parrots that my outlook
broadened. So my problem was not with anthropomorphism; rather, it was with
anthropocentrism, which is seeing human beings as the center of the
universe. The parrots broke through that illusion. The understanding that
ultimately came to me from looking in the parrots' eyes - was that their
consciousness is one with mine. We are all one consciousness, and each finite
being embodies a little piece of it. This is the preciousness of all that
lives."
The Parrots' Original and
New Homes:
"...Although tropical dry forest seems to be its preferred habitat, the (wild)
cherry head (conure, or parrot) is occasionally seen in moister forest—although
apparently not rain forest—and in semi-desert. But there is no place where it
is seen often. Its habitat is one of the most devastated on the planet.
There was once continuous dry forest from Esmeraldas in northern Ecuador to
south of Tumbes in Peru. But dry forest makes good agricultural land; today,
nearly all of it has been cleared, much of it for banana plantations. Current
estimates of its destruction range from 95 percent to 99 percent...
At the time (1992) that the Wild
Bird Conservation Act became law (in the U.S.), there were already millions of
wild parrots in homes in (this country). Many novice parrot owners discovered
that the beautiful and relatively inexpensive parrot they'd bought (cherry heads
sold for under $100) really was a wild bird. The birds feared them and hated
captivity. Some screamed endlessly, and they bit their owners. Angry and
frustrated themselves, some pet owners tossed the birds out windows. As wild
birds, the parrots were constantly looking for an opportunity to escape, and
many did. There were also handling accidents at pet stores and airports. There
is a surprisingly large number of wild parrot flocks in the United States today,
and many of them live near airports. In any locale, whenever enough parrots of
the same species have found each other, they've begun to breed. One study
claims that there are at least twenty-seven parrot species living free and
breeding in the United States. I've heard of parrot flocks, large and small, in
Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Louisiana, New York, Texas, Oregon,
southern California, Utah and Washington State. They have succeeded for at
least two reasons. First, along with corvids, owls and woodpeckers, parrots are
considered to be among the smartest birds. Second, there is a large amount of
food available to them. American cities and suburbs are large, human-built
ecologies in which parrots are able to thrive. Gardens and parks are usually
designed to have something growing in them at all times of the year. Sometimes
the plants are even exotics native to the parrot's home territory. That as many
different species can thrive outside their native habitat indicates adaptability
with regard to diet. They've also learned to use bird feeders. So far, none of
the wild parrot flocks have left urban or suburban areas. If they were to
venture out of urban areas, they would more than likely starve to death. Birds
don't migrate because of cold, but rather because there isn't enough food for
them in winter. One of America's largest wild parrot flocks lives year round in
Chicago. Temperature is simply not an issue...."
The Three Stooges:
"...The entire flock landed on the fire escape. All twenty-six of them. I was
ecstatic. It had been years since I felt that kind of joy. The day before,
when the first three came to the bowl, I'd been about ten feet away from them.
Since they'd been comfortable with that, I carefully maintained the same
distance now. The flock started coming every day, and each time they did, I'd
move a step or two closer to the Dutch door that led to the fire escape. After
about a week, I was right up against it. I slowly eased myself down to the
kitchen floor and sat in font of the lower window to watch. I did not go
unnoticed. The parrots kept one eye trained on me at all times. Whenever I
made even the smallest motion, they bolted instantly and in unison back to the
trees and power lines. After a few minutes of cautious waiting, they would
return one by one to resume their feasting and fighting.
The scene at the bowl was
chaos. They were screaming furiously and running all around the area directly
in front of me. They had large, floppy feet, and I got a big kick out of
watching their clumsy, plodding runs across the fire escape floor. Their colors
were luminous. The green had a shimmer that was almost psychedelic, while the
red was a bright fire-engine red. I was struck by their eyes again. In a lot
of the native birds I'd seen, the iris was nearly as dark as the pupil, which
made the eye appear empty and impassive. But the cherry heads had a light iris,
and the black pupil stood out distinctly. I could see their emotions, which
were constantly shifting from playfulness to curiosity to rage. Fights were
breaking out everywhere. A bird would jump on the lip of the bowl and lunge at
the bird next to him, stabbing him with his beak if there was any resistance.
They used their beaks on one another quite freely. Birds perched on the bowl
were often attacked from behind with a bite on the leg or wing, or a yank on the
tail. The bitten bird would scream loudly and fly away. I was totally
captivated. It was like watching the Three Stooges, only much funnier."
Q & A with Mark Bittner and Judy Irving
(Wild
Parrots “star” and director)
Interviewer:
Let’s start with how long the flock has been flying free in San Francisco, and
how it got started.
Mark:
All the birds that started the flock were originally wild-caught cherry–headed
conures (a.k.a. red-masked parakeets) shipped up from South America (Ecuador and
Peru) to be sold as pets. My ideas on how they actually got loose change all the
time. My current theory is that it was a combination of individual escapees and
frustrated pet owners. The story of some birds getting loose outside a pet shop
is possible, but then a lot of the stories I’ve heard are plausible. I have some
leg band numbers, but that has proven to be a dead end. It only takes you to the
quarantine station, not to who may have owned the bird after that. The first
pair came together around 1987 and started breeding in 1989, so I always think
of the flock as starting that year. Other parrots of the same species began to
join up with the original group a few years later.
I: Some people
think the parrots should be captured and given homes; other people believe any
unwanted bird should be released. What do you think?
M: No and no. We
shouldn’t try to capture them. They're doing fine on their own, and they have
family relationships, which they have the right to maintain. They love being
free; why should we take that away from them? And another thing: They're one of
the few birds that everybody, regardless of their interest, stops to notice. So
they make great ambassadors for wildlife. As for releasing pets, I don’t believe
that domestic, hand-raised birds would survive.
I:
You say you’re not a parrot expert, but do you think you have anything to share
with those who study parrots in South America?
M:
Well, I am an expert on this flock. I know its history and the individual birds
and their relationships. Having had this experience, I know a lot more details
about parrots than some people. I do think I could give some insight to field
researchers, but I believe they’re a little bit concerned about me. It seems
they have very strict rules about how to engage with a species, while I don’t
follow anything like that. There’s an attitude that “If you’re studying birds
then you should do it in a scientific way,” as if there are no other approaches.
I think that’s a bit ridiculous, because you can interact with the world any way
you please. I didn’t get into this to be scientific, but inadvertently I have
learned a lot of facts. I have no interest in seeing things in an untruthful
way. I always try to be accurate.
I:
Have you seen a pecking order?
M:
No. There is none. Even if a bird is aggressive, he doesn’t obtain a leadership
position. There is no dominant bird that the other birds follow. One aggressive
bird was actually kicked out of the flock for a while. The flock would come to
eat, and he had to stay up in the trees.
I:
You’re feeding strictly sunflower seeds. What else is in the parrots’ diet?
M:
They eat a lot of juniper berries, which, oddly, I’ve seen listed as poisonous
to parrots. They eat fruit from backyard trees growing in the area—strawberry
guavas, pears, apples, loquats, wild blackberries, etc.. They eat pine nuts and
a lot of blossoms. Their range, by the way, is about four miles along the north
waterfront. They are more accurately described as the North Waterfront Parrots.
But at mid-summer they expand that range by about three miles down the center of
the city. I believe it’s for food they find there at that time—especially
Hawthorne berries.
I:
Do you see a breeding cycle?
M:
Yes, and it’s very consistent. They lay right around the first day of summer. I
know because the females stop showing up for the feedings.
I:
This hasn’t all been fun for you. I know you’ve nursed several sick birds over
the years. Can you share some of those problems?
M:
The main problem I had in the past was with young birds contracting some
disease. We were never sure what it was, but it was probably pigeon
paramyxovirus. The city has lots of pigeons. For a while there, every spring and
summer, several of the juveniles developed the virus. The flock seems to have
progressed beyond this problem. I never had the money to properly test any
birds, but generally the flock is very healthy now.
I:
And there were other tragedies involving predators. Will you share a story with
the readers?
M:
Sure. Parents often stash their babies in a tree near my house, go out to
forage, and then come back to feed their young. At the same time that the babies
fledge, we also get an active migration of hawks through the city. One day I
heard a parrot screaming, so I ran out and found a hawk on a telephone pole with
a baby in its talons. The hawk had probably dived into the tree and caught one
of the babies. The baby was still alive, and the hawk was ripping it apart. It
was extremely unnerving to witness.
I:
More of these stories are in your book
The Wild Parrots of
Telegraph Hill – A Love Story with Wings.
Do you want to make a plug?
M:
Ok. I’ve had a very positive reaction to the book, and not just from bird
people. The story has gotten around by word of mouth. People who don’t keep
birds seem to enjoy it equally well. My publisher, Harmony Books, is New
York-based, and they have good connections. The book is in stores coast to
coast. Naturally, parrot people will identify with it. They recognize and relate
to the stories first-hand. People around San Francisco are picking it up because
they’ve seen the flock. But I think other people find it to be something unusual
and different. Sometimes that’s what you want from a book. It’s a story
first and foremost.
I:
If need be, I could testify that the book moves into a deeper story, but the
really convincing arguments are that your book has had strong sales in hardcover
and has become a movie coming to local theaters. Fill us in on the details?
M:
Well, that’s Judy’s job, but I’ll tell you that the film won awards in two major
film festivals....Incidentally, the paperback is coming out just a few days
before the San Francisco premiere.
I:
Are you amazed at the turn of events and the ride you're on?
M: Not exactly. It's
been gradual, so I've had plenty of time to grow accustomed to each step along
the way. But it's illuminating to find that a person can get into something
without thought of what it might bring—just do it for the love of it—and then
have that thing be the answer to so many of your dreams. That amazes me. And I
think that's something that everybody wishes for. So I feel lucky. It’s given me
the confidence to start another book. It won’t have anything to do with parrots,
but I really feel like I have a path now.
I:
Judy, what is your experience with birds?
Judy: I started loving
birds because of my grandfather, who lived out on the North Fork of Long Island.
He had trained wild chickadees to eat out of his hand, and he taught me how to
remain calm and feed them too, when I was about 8 years old. He also had
binoculars and a spotting scope, which he let me look through. But then I got
interested in horses, and after horses, boys, and as I entered adult life I sort
of forgot what a joy birds were. I still liked them. Sometimes I included them
as background in my films. Then, 15 years ago, I bought a cockatiel, and
Sweetheart introduced me to the parrot world.
I: How much
did you know about the Cherry-head flock prior to meeting Mark?
J: I only knew what Mark
had written in Bird Talk, a pet parrot magazine, back in 1995. I didn’t
know a lot about keeping birds, so I read the magazine, and when I read Mark’s
story I thought it might make an interesting short film. But Mark wrote that he
would soon be leaving the Greenwich Steps, so I felt he’d be gone before I could
even get started. Later I did do a short film on the great blue herons that had
started nesting in Golden Gate Park in San Francisco. The film had a showing at
a museum and two friends, independent of each other, told me I needed to
consider meeting the parrot man living on Telegraph Hill.
I: Did you
have a concept for the film in mind when you knocked on Mark’s door?
J: Not really, just that
it would be short. I had a few rolls of film left over from another project, and
I thought I could use it up. I didn’t think you could go very far with one guy
feeding some parrots. At the least I thought it would be colorful.
I: At what
point did you realize a larger story was unfolding?
J: Well the film had two
development stages. First, when I met Mark, I thought he was too much of a
hermit to communicate clearly about the birds. He lived in an absolute shack, he
had rough clothes and very long hair and he seemed like a burned-out hippie
unable to string two words together! But when he fed the birds it was like this
wonderful, magical moment. The birds came swooping down into the garden and
landed on his shoulders and arms and all around. Watching this I thought that
maybe I could do some sort of 20-minute children’s fable and bring in a troop of
young actors to watch and interact. But after a couple of weekend shoots I
decided it wasn’t going to work. They say you shouldn’t try to make a movie with
both kids and wild animals, and they’re right! The good news was that
Mark’s work with the kids was fantastic. He told terrific stories about the
birds and I realized he was actually very articulate. So the film’s direction
changed and Mark became the center of a story about his relationship with the
flock. And every story Mark shared about the parrots was true; certain birds
were constant cuddlers, another was an old standoffish grump. I rolled film and
it’s all right there in the footage.
I:
After establishing Mark’s relationship with the parrots things became
complicated. You get engulfed in it and while we see very little of you in the
film you provide a fair amount of narrative in the way of questions to Mark –
the viewer knows who you are. Is this your normal routine or was it hard for you
to enter the film?
J: Oh it was hard, and
for the longest time I stayed out of it. The film wound up taking four and a
half years to finish, in part because the story kept unfolding. We would be
logging film and starting editing and then we'd have to rush out and shoot
something new. I like to work behind the camera, not in front of it, but issues
arose that demanded I take a more active role. A couple of film editor friends
who saw the rough cut just insisted on it because I had become somewhat of a
mystery woman lurking at the edges.
I:
This film is unlike any movie I’ve seen in the theater but it is hard to
consider it a documentary. How do you classify this film?
J: It’s a nonfiction
feature. But it’s like a narrative film because it has a story arc, a main
character, and a supporting cast both human and avian. When it played at the San
Francisco International film festival, the reviewer from the San Jose Mercury
News summed it up: “It is that rare documentary that has romance, comedy,
and a surprise ending that makes you feel like you could fly out of the theater
like a cherry-headed conure.” I like that quote; we’ll probably add it to the
movie poster.
I: How proud
of this film are you?
J: Well, pride, (laughs)
that’s a slippery slope. I am very happy with the film. I do feel like I got
lucky in many ways. I had a lot of fun making it but I also think it is my best
work. It’s won a couple of audience awards at festivals so that makes me feel
good.
I:
Is there anything else we need to know about the film?
J: Only that it’s flying
into a theater near you in 2005. It was originally shot on
16mm film, not video, and that’s rare for a documentary
these days. The wide-screen 35mm blowup looks great
The Wild Parrots of
Telegraph Hill - The Book
Mark Bittner's autobiographical book,
The Wild Parrots of Telegraph Hill is published in hardcover by
Harmony Books, a division of Random House, and in paperback (starting Jan. 27,
2005) by Three Rivers Press.
“instructive, surprising, sweet…”
Gary Snyder, Pulitzer-Prize-winning poet
& naturalist -
(book jacket blurb)
“charming memoir…for devoted birders everywhere.”
Reader’s Digest—“Editor’s
Choice”
“a healthy dose of inspiration disguised as oddball
autobiography…not simply for bird-lovers, (it’s) the perfect read for anybody
who believes that success means more than a corner office.”
Elle Magazine
“inspirational saga of one man finding his life's meaning
in the most serendipitous way….”
San Jose
Mercury News
“essential and delightful reading…successfully inspires
readers to find nature and peace in whatever place on the planet they happen to
occupy.”
James D. Gilardi,
PhD. Director, World Parrot Trust
“appealing, heartfelt…”
Publishers Weekly
“a glimpse into an altogether different plane of
existence….Bittner's relationship with the parrots is profound enough to spark
envy. A pleasure and an education.”
Kirkus Reviews
|